# Xue Er De -Fen Library

Symmetry And Group

# Course 311: Michaelmas Term 2001. Topics in Group Theory by Wilkins D.R. By Wilkins D.R.

Best symmetry and group books

Finite group theory

Over the last 30 years the speculation of finite teams has constructed dramatically. Our knowing of finite basic teams has been greater by way of their category. many questions on arbitrary teams could be diminished to related questions about uncomplicated teams and purposes of the idea are commencing to seem in different branches of arithmetic.

Extra resources for Course 311: Michaelmas Term 2001. Topics in Group Theory

Sample text

Gn of subgroups of G, where G0 = {1} and Gn = G, such that Gi−1 is normal in Gi and Gi /Gi−1 is Abelian for i = 1, 2, . . , n. Example The symmetric group Σ4 is solvable. Indeed let V4 be the Kleinsche Viergruppe consisting of the identity permutation ι and the permutations (12)(34), (13)(24) and (14)(23), and let A4 be the alternating group consisting of all even permutations of {1, 2, 3, 4}. Then {ι} V4 A4 Σ4 , V4 is Abelian, A4 /V4 is cyclic of order 3, and Σ4 /A4 is cyclic of order 2. 54 Let G be a group, let H1 and H2 be subgroups of G, where H1 H2 , and let J1 = H1 ∩ N , J2 = H2 ∩ N , K1 = H1 N/N and K2 = H2 N/N , where N is some normal subgroup of G.

Now the number np of Sylow p-subgroups divides pq and satisfies np ≡ 1 (mod p), by the Second Sylow Theorem. Clearly np cannot be divisible by p, and therefore either np = 1 or np = q. But q ≡ 1 (mod p). It follows that np = 1. Thus the group G has just one subgroup of order p. Now, given any element g of G, the subgroups Np and gNp g −1 are of order p. It follows that gNp g −1 = Np for all elements g of G. Thus Np is a normal subgroup of G. A similar argument shows that Nq is also a normal subgroup of G, since p < q, and therefore p ≡ 1 (mod q).

Otherwise the group G contains at least two distinct subgroups H and K of order 9. 52 that |H ∩ K| ≥ 94 . But |H ∩ K| divides 9, by Lagrange’s Theorem, since H ∩ K is a subgroup of H and of K. Therefore |H ∩ K| = 3. 53 we see that H ∩ K is a normal subgroup of H and of K. Let J = {g ∈ G : g(H ∩ K)g −1 = H ∩ K}. Then J is a subgroup of G, and H ∩ K is a normal subgroup of J. Moreover H and K are subgroups of J, and therefore |J| is divisible by 9, by Lagrange’s Theorem. But J is a subgroup of G, and hence |J| divides 36.